In community noticeboard capacity here:
In 2008 consultants working for Transport for London (the UK’s Transport Research Laboratory and Living Streets) completed a report into road safety around King’s Cross. It was a detailed document describing the individual danger points throughout the area and giving recommendations for each. It warned that further road accidents were likely to occur should its findings not be acted upon. The report was never published and its findings were never acted upon.
In 2009 consultants working for Transport for London (Colin Buchanan, recently merged with Sinclair Knight Merz) completed a report into road safety around King’s Cross. At no point did it reference the earlier report. It started by giving two options to TfL – a toss of the coin except that this coin was weighted. It concluded that the cheapest option which leaves the gyratory system with its current layout should be taken forward. The report has not been published and its findings are now being acted upon.
The 2008 report consulted with 30 different organisations and individuals. Two of these could be said to have had a conflict of interest as they would have to pay for any changes made to the changes made to the traffic system.
The 2009 report consulted with five different organisations and individuals. Three of these could be said to have had a conflict of interest as they would have to pay for any changes made to the traffic system.
These reports continue the long history of studies, reports and research projects into traffic and road safety in King’s Cross. Have a look at the diagram in this article to get an idea of the complexity of these in recent years – and that diagram does not include everything. Combined with the number of accidents taking place here, and we are at much greater risk of collisions of any kind than is the norm in London, surely this gives a clear case for an imaginative, radical solution. Planners and transport specialists themselves must be frustrated at having to revisit this area time and time again. Bet they’d love to get their teeth into a real solution.
London Cycling Campaign is now working on the ‘Go Dutch Campaign‘. Its principles maybe cycle centred, but taken as a whole they are an ideal start for making roads safe for each type of road user. It is this imaginative thinking we desperately need for King’s Cross.
Central St Martin’s, University of the Arts London have joined the campaign. They moved to KX this term and are reeling from the effects of the hazardous traffic layout that is the KX gyratory. Please sign the online petition Central St Martin’s have set up to Go Dutch in KX.
John Ashwell recently put out a plea for funding to replace some of the trees that he’s stolidly fundraised for in the past. As a result of John’s work the King’s Cross community has paid for the majority of the trees on the north east side of the station so are rightly pleased and proud to help maintain them:
“Thank you to one and all who contributed towards the fundraising campaign to replace the two trees that had blown over outside Lighterman House on Wharfdale Road.
“The community came up trumps, and for that I extend much gratitude to you all – I will be handing over a total of £954.83 in cash and cheques to the council tomorrow. We have raised enough money to fund both the missing trees with guards and a full 3-year watering contract, to which plaques will be attached to acknowledge that they have been gifted to the public realm by local residents. The additional amount over and above the amount required for these two trees we are hoping will go towards a third tree, possibly outside the new Pret at 2 Wharfdale. I have discussed this with the council, and will look at the location when we meet on Friday.
“Those of you who paid by cheque can expect to see these cheques clearing your account in the next week or so.
“Thank you again for your generosity.”
There are many strands to the community’s re-action to the continual failure of TfL to manage our space in a sensible and safe way. Here’s another good example.
A message from Central St Martins / University of Arts London: lobby TfL to develop two accident blackspots. More here
The guys over at King’s Cross central have launched a dedicated arts programme for the area – Relay
Their first commission is this great looking giant bird cage that’s going to do all manner of things, in different places over the next few years. Find out more
For more then ten years No. 9 Caledonian Road has been a Licensed Sex Shop…. but most local residents never realized this as it’s license from the Council contained several Conditions that probhibited the premises from advertising “adult” materials in the window and forbad the use of the typical red neon sign Adult Sex Shop(allowed only inside the store and not visible from the street).
Suddenly however and without notice to local residents (or even our local Concillors), this has changed as the shop has “redecorated” its frontage. This new look has created outrage as it now looks like what it is – a sex shop. Already numberous emails expressing displeasure have been directed to our Councillor who appears to have been just as surprised as local residents. He has responded quickly and has been working to get the matter resolved. The Bulletin Board has now heard from Jan Hart, Direct of Public Protection. Here is what she has to say about the situation:
To clarify, the shop has been licensed for several years and the renewal was advertised on the premises and in the local press as is required for these applications. The notice was displayed on the shop and checked on the 13th May, the advert was in the Islington Gazette on the 10th May.
Ward Councillors were consulted on the renewal. The improvements we could have made, would have been to go further than the legal requirement and explain the detail of the renewal when writing to ward councillors, as well as contacting local residents who we knew were interested in previous applications. It is this that I will be implementing from now.
The policy we have on sex shops is that no more will be allowed. The spirit of the policy is that those in place will be allowed to continue, however should there be a change in ownership, then the recommendation would be to refuse.
I will be meeting with the owner later this week. I will be advising
him that the frontage is not acceptable. A reorganisation of the shop and some internal changes would allow it to be as before with no advertising or signage on the window or door. The current advertising on the windows does not satisfy our conditions, the front door should not be open displaying the internal sign and the whole arrangement allows products to be seen from the street, which should not be the case.
I will contact you again after my meeting next week.
Jan Hart
Service Director – Public Protection
Environment and Regeneration
Islington Council
We will post further updates as they are received.
Extract from the Islington Tribune 11 November 2011:
“CENTRAL St Martin’s College is to set up a special award in memory of an “exceptional” young student following her death last month.
A proposal for a series of lasting tributes was revealed at a private memorial event for Min Joo Lee, who was known as Deep Lee, at the King’s Cross college on Thursday night.
The 24-year-old, who was planning to launch her own fashion label after leaving college, died under the wheels of a lorry at the junction of York Way and Gray’s Inn Road on October 3.
She was the 11th woman to die on Islington and Camden’s roads in the past five years.”