It's a simple question…yes or no. Please humor me by responding with a comment below if you're interested in making your voice heard. Hopefully members of the local press that read this will pick-up on the responses.
If you're wondering what prompted this question, it's the email that I just received from the Council which highlighted the results of a recent consultation they did. In it, one of the questions was near and dear to my heart – it was about whether or not local residents wanted more tall buildings in certain areas of the borough.
As I have been a campaigner against more tall buildings, I was keen to see how others felt. However, I was quite surpirsed by the answer which prompted me to look a little closer. Below you will see my comments to the Council:
Dear XXX (sent to the person who published the results)
Statistics get a bad name as folks have now realized that oftentimes the way you ask the question can influence the response. In fact now-a-days, most people are leery of Government statistics for just that reason. In the following, I illustrate a clear example of what I mean.
First however, to ensure you understand my motivation for writing, you should know who I am – a campaigner against more tall buildings in the Borough.
I’ve just looked at the headline results for the Your Neighbourhood, Your Islington (otherwise known as the Core Planning Strategy) Study that has just been completed. I draw your attention to the phrases highlighted in bold type as examples of how your questions most likely influenced the answers.
3.8 Tall buildings
(Your conclusion) Opinion was greatly divided on the approach to tall buildings. Almost half of respondents were in favour of allowing tall buildings in five restricted locations, whereas the same proportion wanted to restrict the height of new buildings.
(And here are the two choices you gave folks to respond)
Allow tall buildings in five restricted locations to help meet demand for housing and employment. At Archway station, Finsbury Park station, Holloway Road station, Kings Cross Triangle and some sites in south Islington that border the city.
Restrict the height of new buildings in all locations so that they are no higher than surrounding buildings, although this could mean less space for housing and employment.
Why were these emotive phrases added to the simple question of “do you or do you not support more tall buildings in certain areas of the Borough?” It seems to me you have tried to tie the Council’s justification in seeking more tall buildings to the issue of housing and employment and who would not want more housing and employment!
I find it especially interesting that even with these phrases added that the results are split, leading me to believe that had you not inserted these phrases, the results would clearly have tipped in favour of no more tall buildings!
From this observation on one point of the study, I now have no faith in the entire study.
So now over to you, the public. Do you want to allow tall buildings in five restricted locations - at Archway station, Finsbury Park station, Holloway Road station, Kings Cross Triangle and some sites in south Islington that border the city? Please respond with a yes or no in the comments section below.